thinkhumble.in

🍪 This website uses cookies to enhance your experience.

The Painful Hiring Moment That Became the Origin of ThinkHumble

Few years ago, I walked into an interview room to evaluate software engineering candidates, not knowing that one encounter would challenge everything I thought I knew about hiring.

I’d been part of panels before. I’d screened hundreds of resumes. I’d sat through countless rounds of interviews. It felt like any other day at a global tech company known for discipline, structure and exceptionally high standards.

A stack of resumes, back-to-back interviews, a bright room with white lights and glass walls. Nothing unusual!

But over the next 48 hours, something happened that permanently changed the way I see talent and set me on a mission I didn’t know I would one day dedicate my life to.

This is that story.

The Candidate Who Shattered My Confidence in the System

He walked in with the kind of presence that makes you think:

“We found our guy.”

● A crisp resume

● Measured communication

● Calm confidence

For the first few minutes, he was flawless.

Then I gave him a simple logic question, the kind of foundational prompt anyone in that role should at least attempt.

But he didn’t attempt. He didn’t think so. He just… froze.

Ten seconds. Thirty seconds. A minute...Four long, breathless minutes

Finally, he whispered “Sir… is there any hint?”

And something inside me cracked.

Not because he didn’t know the answer.

But because I realized something unsettling:

● He knew how to talk about skill.

● He didn’t know how to use it.

● And he wasn’t the exception. He was the symptom.

A symptom of a system that rewards:

● Polish, not ability

● Presentation, not performance

● Coaching, not competence

That was the first shift.

Two Days. Eighteen Candidates. One Disturbing Pattern.

In those two days, I interviewed 18 candidates.

Different universities. Different stories. Different levels of confidence.

Yet the patterns were hauntingly similar:

● Brilliant talkers who couldn’t apply basic logic

● Candidates trained to “perform,” not solve

● People who spoke fluently but couldn’t write clean code

● Smart minds who froze because interviews weren’t built for their personality

● Resumes stuffed with keywords but empty of real capability

No one had prepared them for thinking. They had only been prepared for answering.

And suddenly I was forced to confront a truth I had avoided for years:

Hiring isn’t broken because talent is weak. Hiring is broken because evaluation is shallow.

The Moment Everything Snapped Into Focus

One candidate: quiet, shy, barely audible solved the problem beautifully.

Another: polished, confident, articulate failed at the simplest real-world task.

● Guess who looked more “interview-ready”?

● Guess who would’ve been selected in a traditional system?

● Guess who actually deserved the job?

That disconnect hit me like a punch in the gut.

It wasn’t malice. It wasn’t incompetence. It was simply how our systems were built:

● To judge the loudest, not the smartest

● To reward the rehearsed, not the real

● To trust the surface, not the substance

I walked out of that building uneasy. Not because the candidates were lacking. But because the process was.

The Question That Kept Me Awake All Night

Long after dinner, long after work ended, long after the world quieted down, one question kept echoing:

“If this is happening inside a top-tier company… what are smaller teams going through?”

Because unlike large companies, smaller teams don’t have structured rubrics, five interviewers, calibrated scoring, seasoned evaluators or endless interview cycles. They have resumes, gut feel, rushed conversations, incomplete evaluation and inconsistent judgment.

And suddenly, it hit me:

The problem wasn’t the talent. The problem was the lens through which we viewed talent.

By midnight, I knew one thing for certain:

“I can’t keep accepting this system the way it is.”

I didn’t know it then, but that moment would become the origin story of my life’s work.

The Decision That Quietly Changed My Career

I didn’t set out to build a product. I wasn’t chasing a market opportunity. I wasn’t trying to join the HR-tech wave.

ThinkHumble was born out of:

● Frustration

● Helplessness

● Watching good candidates fail for the wrong reasons

● Watching teams fail because they made decisions in the dark

I wanted something that:

● Measures real skill with fairness

● Evaluates how people think, not how they talk

● Eliminates avoidable bias

● Standardizes evaluation

● Uncovers potential

● Strengthens decision-making

● Puts truth back into hiring

Every problem I had witnessed turned into a solution. Not theoretical. Not borrowed. Not inspired by a competitor.

A solution born from pain.

Every time ThinkHumble helps a company skip a wrong hire… Every time a candidate gets evaluated fairly… Every time a team says,

“This finally feels right”…

I go back to that room.

● The silence

● The tension

● The four minutes of uncertainty

● The realization that changed everything

That moment taught me: Talent isn’t broken. Hiring is.

And everything since: skills-first assessments, simulations, psychometrics, auto-scoring, proctoring exists to fix that gap.

Not to replace humans. But to:

● Remove bias

● Bring clarity

● Make hiring truthful again

Why This Matters More Today Than Ever

Today, we live in a world where:

● Resumes can be AI-generated

● Interviews can be rehearsed endlessly

● Confidence can overshadow competence

● Keywords can mask gaps

● Presentation can hide reality

But real work still demands real skill.

If we continue evaluating talent the way we always have, we’re not just risking bad hires, we’re risking the future of teams, products and innovation.

Three years ago, one moment of silence in a glass-walled room changed the trajectory of my life.

Today, I know this with absolute clarity:

Great companies are not built by great hiring processes. They’re built by the people who survive those processes.

Today, my mission is simple but it carries everything I’ve learned, felt and fought for over these years:

● To give companies clarity in every hire

● To give founders confidence in building their vision

● To give HR teams a system they can trust, without endless fatigue or uncertainty

● To give candidates a fair chance to show who they truly are, beyond resumes and rehearsed answers

To restore truth. To honor real skill. To ensure the right people rise not by luck, not by charm, but because they deserve to.

Every. Single. Time.

Because I’ve seen what happens when hiring fails, dreams delayed, teams weakened, potential wasted. And I refuse to let that happen again.